Funadhoo MP Mohamed Mamdooh has raised concerns over what he perceives as inconsistencies in the Maldivian Democratic Party’s (MDP) approach to governance and parliamentary proceedings, depending on whether the party is in power or in opposition.

Speaking on MMTV’s Bodu Khabaru programme, he addressed the anti-defection law and its implications for parliamentary stability.

MP Mamdooh noted that both the 18th and 19th Parliaments were involved in drafting and refining the anti-defection law. He emphasised that the 19th Parliament, which held an MDP supermajority, had strongly advocated for preserving the integrity of elected representatives, ensuring that MPs remained aligned with their original mandate rather than contributing to political instability. He suggested that recent discourse on the matter appeared to diverge from previously established positions.

Furthermore, he highlighted that the constitutional amendment related to the anti-defection law had been enacted with the support of 78 lawmakers, reflecting a broad consensus at the time. In light of this, he questioned whether judicial intervention in such a legislative decision would be appropriate, stressing the importance of upholding parliamentary autonomy and respecting established legislative processes.

MP Mamdooh also observed a shift in the legal community’s stance on the issue. He recalled that, at the time of the law’s passage, legal experts had raised concerns regarding a legal vacuum and had advocated for amendments to address the matter. However, he noted that contemporary legal discourse appeared to have evolved, resulting in differing interpretations.

Regarding the potential involvement of the Supreme Court, MP Mamdooh cautioned that such intervention could set a precedent with far-reaching implications for future parliamentary decisions. He stressed the necessity of maintaining a clear separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches, asserting that preserving this balance is essential for the effective functioning of democratic institutions.